National Parks: Preservation and Adventures

Land that inspires, trails that challenge, life that endures


Home Weekly Theme All Themes Dictionaries

Parks Guardians of the Wild

Parks Saving Endangered Species

Three Continents, Three Missions: Parks Fighting for Survival

1

How Parks Came to Be

Where conservation takes root

Start Learning
2

How to Become a Hiker

Where every path leads to discovery

Start Learning
3

Bringing Animals Back

Where extinction gives way to hope

You are here
Home Themes National Parks: Preservation and Adventures How to Become a Hiker
👥

Join Our Community!

Study the phrasal verbs on this page and then join our community with suggestions, comments, and learning

f Join the Community

Your Learning Progress

0
Total Points
0
Exercises
0%
Success Rate
0
Study Seconds

Exercise Status

Session Debug:
Waiting for exercises...

Multimedia Learning Hub

🎥 Listen, watch and practice phrasal verbs with real-time shadowing

🎭 Master Phrasal Verbs Through Shadowing Practice

English Phrasal Verbs Shadowing Practice - Interactive Learning
🌟 Access All Our Themes
Explore themes • Interactive content • Complete learning experience

🎙️ English Phrasal Verbs Video Podcast

Weekly Cross Podcast - English Communication Evolution
🎯 Access Interactive English Phrasal Verbs Dictionary
Master advanced phrasal verbs with contextual exercises

Content Navigation

Click on the cards below to navigate through the content

Bring Them Back!

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

Why These Parks? Why These Animals?

Whimsical illustrated map of the world with forests, wildlife, and sailing ships

Imagine a world where American bison exist only in old photographs. Where the shoebill stork is a legend told by grandparents. Where tigers survive only in zoos.

That future almost happened.

On three different continents, three parks fought off desperate battles against extinction. Each chose to protect an iconic species. Each faced unique challenges. Each proved that conservation works – when there's political will and consistent action

Yellowstone saved the bison from dying out completely. Bangweulu protected one of the planet's strangest birds from being wiped out. Ranthambore brought back tigers from the edge of extinction into symbols of hope

These aren't just environmental success stories. They're narratives about our capacity to make up for historical mistakes. About communities that chose to put up with dangerous predators. About governments that prioritized nature over immediate profit.

Prepare to meet three extraordinary animals and the parks that became their last refuges on Earth.

Bisons Near to extinction

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

🌎 AMERICAS - The Yellowstone Bison


60 Million to 500: A Near Extinction

In 1800, approximately 60 million bison roamed the Great Plains of North America. They were so numerous that their migrations could take up days to pass a single point. Indigenous tribes based their entire culture on these animals – food, clothing, tools, shelter

Then came the 19th century.

In just 100 years, the bison population dropped off from 60 million to fewer than 1,000 animals. It wasn't an accident. It was deliberate policy.

The United States government carried out mass bison slaughter as a military strategy. The logic was brutal and simple: without bison, Indigenous tribes couldn't hold on in the plains. Professional hunters gunned down hundreds per day, often leaving carcasses to rot. Tourists shot bison from moving trains, for entertainment.

By 1902, only 23 wild bison remained in Yellowstone. Twenty-three animals to represent 60 million.

Total extinction seemed a matter of months.

A powerful American bison standing alone in a golden grassland under a dramatic, cloudy sky. The animal faces the viewer directly, symbolizing strength, resilience, and the success of conservation efforts in national parks.

Bisons in Yellowstone

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

How Yellowstone Saved the Bison

A misty landscape in Yellowstone National Park showing a bison standing near a riverbank, with fog covering the forested hills in the background and other bison grazing in the distance. The scene is moody and serene, emphasizing the wild and protected environment of the park.

Yellowstone. Between 1902 and 1907, the park imported 21 animals from different sources. It wasn't ideal – genetics were limited – but it was the only chance.

The captive breeding program worked. Slowly, bison numbers built up. 50 animals in 1915. 100 in 1920. 500 in 1930.

But the real revolution happened in the 1960s when Yellowstone turned around its management philosophy. Before, bison were treated like cattle – artificially fed, kept in enclosures, cut down when "surplus." The new policy was radical: let bison be wild.

No artificial feeding. No internal fences. No artificial population control. Just habitat and protection from hunting.

The bison responded. The population took off to 3,000, then 4,000 animals. Yellowstone proved something crucial: near-extinct species can bounce back if given space and protection.

Today, approximately 5,000 bison live in Yellowstone – the largest population of wild bison on continuous public lands in the United States.

Bisons Near of extinction

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

The Ongoing Battle for Space

But the story doesn't have a completely happy ending

When bison head out of Yellowstone's boundaries in winter searching for food, they run into direct conflict with ranchers. The reason? Brucellosis – a disease bison can pass on that can infect domestic cattle, causing abortions

Montana, the neighboring state, carries out a controversial protocol: bison that cross over the park boundary can be captured and sent to slaughter. Between 2000 and 2020, more than 10,000 bison were put down this way.

Environmentalists call it "massacre." Ranchers argue they're protecting their industry. Scientists point out there's never been a documented case of bison passing on brucellosis to cattle under natural conditions.

The conflict illustrates a fundamental challenge of modern conservation: animals don't stick to human boundaries. Yellowstone can protect bison within its limits, but what about when they move around naturally?

There's still no solution. But organizations are working to set up wildlife corridors – areas where bison can migrate without conflict. It's slow, expensive, politically difficult.

And absolutely necessary if we want bison to remain truly wild

A herd of American bisonz run across a dry grassland with snow-covered mountains and a pine forest in the background, symbolizing wildlife resurgence in protected natural parks.r

Yellowstone Bison Conservation Exercise

Click on the blanks to choose the correct phrasal verb

Question 1:
In 1800, bison migrations could _________ days to pass a single point, and Indigenous tribes _________ their entire culture on these animals.
Question 2:
The bison population _________ from 60 million to fewer than 1,000 as they were being systematically _________.
Question 3:
The US government _________ mass bison slaughter, and professional hunters _________ hundreds per day.
Question 4:
Without bison, Indigenous tribes couldn't _________ in the plains, and the species was _________.
Question 5:
Yellowstone _________ a breeding program and bison numbers slowly _________.
Question 6:
In the 1960s, Yellowstone _________ its management philosophy and let the population _________.
Question 7:
Near-extinct species can _________ if given space, proving we can _________ historical mistakes.
Question 8:
Communities chose to _________ dangerous predators and organizations work to _________ wildlife corridors.
Question 9:
When bison _________ of Yellowstone's boundaries, they _________ direct conflict with ranchers.
Question 10:
Bison that _________ the park boundary can be captured, and more than 10,000 were _________ between 2000 and 2020.
Score: 0/10 questions correct (0%)

A dinosaur among us

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

🌍 AFRICA - The Bangweulu Shoebill

A Dinosaur Among Us: Why Protect One Bird?

The shoebill stork looks like it came out of the Cretaceous period directly. Standing 1.5 meters tall with a gigantic bill and penetrating stare, it resembles a pterodactyl more than a modern bird. And in a way, that's exactly what it is – an evolutionary remnant of ancient lineages.

But why protect such a specific bird? Why did Bangweulu zero in on so much effort on a single species?

First, the shoebill is an "ecosystem indicator." It only survives in pristine papyrus swamps. If the swamps are healthy enough for it, they're healthy for hundreds of other species – fish, amphibians, small mammals, other birds.

Second, it's an "umbrella species." Protecting its habitat automatically protects the entire ecosystem. There's no need to set up separate programs for each species – save the shoebill and you save the entire swamp.

Third, it has immense cultural value for local communities. It's called the "king of the swamps." It shows up in legends, art, songs.

And fourth – perhaps most important – it proves that conservation doesn't need to focus on only "charismatic" animals like lions or elephants. Strange and lesser-known birds also deserve protection.

Only 5,000 to 8,000 shoebills remain in the entire world. Half live in Bangweulu.

Wetlands protection

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

From Hunting Grounds to Protected Wetlands

The Bangweulu wetlands in Zambia were for centuries traditional hunting territory. Local communities fished, hunted small mammals, cut down papyrus. The shoebill was occasionally killed – not for food (the meat is poor), but because nests were accessible and eggs could be sold.

Everything changed in 2008 when African Parks took over management of Bangweulu in partnership with the Zambian government.

The strategy was brilliant: don't throw out communities, but bring them in to conservation.

African Parks took on local rangers. Paid fair wages. Invested in health clinics and schools in adjacent villages. Set up community tourism programs where local families bring in direct income when tourists visit the swamps

The agreement was simple: communities protect the shoebill, and the shoebill brings resources to the communities.

It worked spectacularly

Illegal hunting dropped off 90% in five years. The shoebill population stabilized and began picking up slowly. Most important: communities that once saw the park as restriction now see it as a source of pride and prosperity.

Bangweulu proved that conservation works better when local people aren't shut out, but brought in as protagonists.

Close-up frontal portrait of a shoebill stork with intense yellow eyes and a massive beak, set against a solid black background. The bird’s unique feathers and fierce expression are clearly visible, emphasizing its prehistoric appearance and striking features.

Can teh Shoebill survive us?

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

Can the Shoebill Survive Us?

rial view of the vast wetlands of Bangweulu wetlands in the Zambhia, showing winding rivers, grassy marshes, and isolated clusters of trees under a hazy golden sky.
Ready to read

Despite Bangweulu's success, the shoebill comes up against growing threats.

Climate change is messing up rainfall patterns in East Africa. Swamps are drying up or flooding out of season. The shoebill needs specific water levels to fish – too shallow and fish disappear; too deep and it can't reach prey.

Agricultural development constantly eats away at swamp boundaries. Each hectare drained out for plantations is habitat permanently lost.

And there's illegal trade. Shoebill eggs can sell for up to $1,000 on the black market. Chicks are worth even more. Wealthy collectors in the Middle East and Asia shell out fortunes for live birds.

Bangweulu has only 70 rangers to look after 6,000 square kilometers of swamps. It's impossible to keep track of everything.

The shoebill's long-term survival depends on three factors: expansion of protected areas, effective combat against wildlife trafficking, and continuation of community engagement.

If any of these pillars falls through, the "queen of the swamps" could die out in a generation.

Match the Bangweulu Shoebill Phrasal Verbs
0/10

Click one item in Column A and its meaning in Column B. Complete all pairs.

Column A – Phrasal Verbs

Column B – Meanings

Don't Learn Alone!

Join our English Learning Community on Facebook where students and teachers discuss lessons, share progress, and practice together. Turn your learning into a permanent habit!

💬 Join Our Community

✓ Daily practice tips · ✓ Live discussions · ✓ Support from fellow learners

The Ranthambore

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

🌏 ASIA - The Ranthambore Tigers

Dangerous Beauty: Why Tigers Matter

A photograph of an tiger in the wild, walking towards the viewer.

Tigers are the largest felines on the planet. Supreme hunters. Apex predators that keep in check entire ecosystems. In India, they're also national symbols, almost mythical creatures celebrated in art, literature, and religion for millennia.

But why does saving tigers specifically matter?

Ecologically, tigers are a "keystone species." They hold down populations of large herbivores like deer and wild boar. Without tigers, these populations blow up, devastate vegetation, wipe out habitats of smaller species. A single tiger affects hundreds of other species through the trophic cascade.

Economically, tigers bring in massive tourism. Ranthambore receives 500,000 visitors annually, pumping millions of dollars into the local economy. Hotels, guides, transportation – an entire industry builds on tigers.

Culturally, losing tigers would mean losing part of Indian identity. It would be like England losing its castles or Egypt losing the pyramids.

But tigers are also dangerous. They take out people – about 50 deaths annually in India. They kill livestock. They break into villages. Human-tiger conflict is real and lethal.

In 1970, only 1,800 tigers remained in all of India. Extinction seemed inevitable.

Ranthambore had 20 tigers. Twenty animals to save an entire species.

Machli's Legacy

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

Machli's Legacy: A Story of Survival

Machli – meaning "fish" in Hindi – was born in Ranthambore in 1997. She would turn into the world's most famous tigress.

Why? Because Machli proved that tigers can get along with humans

For 20 years, Machli lived primarily in Ranthambore's tourist zone. She was photographed millions of times. Filmed by international documentarians. Observed by hundreds of thousands of tourists. And she never went after a human.

She took down livestock occasionally – tigers are opportunistic. But she never saw humans as prey. This crucial distinction allowed people and tigers to share space.

Machli had 11 cubs throughout her life. Many survived to adulthood – remarkable survival rates. Her descendants now make up Ranthambore and adjacent parks' populations. Genetically, perhaps 25% of the region's tigers carry on her genes.

When Machli passed away in 2016 at age 19 (exceptional for wild tigers), millions of Indians mourned. The government put out postage stamps in her honor. Documentaries celebrated her life.

But Machli's real legacy wasn't fame. It was proving that conservation can work even in one of the planet's most densely populated regions

If tigers can hold on near 1.4 billion people in India, they can survive anywhere.

A photograph of an tiger in the wild, drinking water, its intense amber eyes staring directly at the camera, with its face reflected on the still surface of the water.

Ranthambore's Triumph

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

From 20 to 80: Ranthambore's Triumph

In 1973, Ranthambore had 20 tigers and an uncertain future. Today it has approximately 80 tigers – the highest tiger density of any park in India.

How did this happen?

First, the Indian government completely did away with tiger hunting in 1972. No exceptions, no special licenses. Zero hunting.

Second, Ranthambore carried out "voluntary relocation" of villages within the park. Families received financial compensation, agricultural land outside the park, and new houses. Not everyone went along with it – and those who wanted to stay could. But many chose to leave, cutting down conflicts.

Third, the park set up buffer zones – areas around the core where some human activity is permitted but regulated. This gave tigers space to spread out without running into densely populated areas directly

Fourth, Ranthambore put millions into conflict mitigation. If a tiger takes out livestock, the owner receives compensation within 48 hours. If a tiger shows up in a village, specialized teams capture and relocate it. No retaliation is permitted

The result? The tiger population shot up fivefold in 50 years

But Ranthambore now faces up to a new problem: overpopulation. 80 tigers in 1,400 km² means territories overlap. Young tigers can't pick out space. Conflicts increase.

The solution? Wildlife corridors linking up Ranthambore to other parks, allowing tigers to move around naturally and fill up areas where they were extinct.

It's complex. It's expensive. It's politically challenging.

But it's the only way to ensure Ranthambore's success is sustainable long-term.


tiger in Ranthambore's tourist zone at sunrise, shimmering golden light spilling across gently flowing crystal-clear waters
Ranthambore Tiger Conservation Quiz
Read carefully and choose the best answer
Question 1/10
Score: 0/10
What does 'keep in check' mean in: 'Supreme hunters that keep in check entire ecosystems'?
0/10
Well done!

Three Parks, Three Truth

0:00 / 0:00
Ready to play

🎯 Conclusion: Three Parks, One Truth What Do These Three Parks Teach Us?

StartingYellowstone, Bangweulu, and Ranthambore are separated by oceans and continents. They protect completely different animals – a massive herbivore, a prehistoric bird, a lethal predator. They deal with unique challenges from their regions

But they all prove the same fundamental truth: extinction is not inevitable

When there's political will, adequate funding, and community engagement, species on the brink of collapse can pull through. Bison came back from 23 to 5,000. Shoebills stabilized in Bangweulu. Tigers grew from 20 to 80 in Ranthambore.

These numbers represent more than statistics. They represent choices

Yellowstone's choice to let bison be wild again. Bangweulu's choice to bring in local communities as partners, not adversaries. Ranthambore's choice to make up for livestock losses instead of allowing retaliation.

But these stories don't have definitive endings.

Bison still face up to slaughter when they cross over boundaries. Shoebills are still threatened by trafficking and climate change. Tigers still need corridors to get around overpopulation.

Conservation isn't a problem solved with a single solution. It's an ongoing process, expensive, politically complicated, and requiring generational commitment.

So why do we do this?

Because every species we save is a second chance. Proof that we can make up for our mistakes. Hope that our grandchildren will see bison, shoebills, and tigers not just in photos, but alive, wild, free.

These three parks aren't just sanctuaries.

They're promises that it's still possible to get along with wild nature – if we're willing to carry out the difficult work required.

The question isn't whether we can save endangered species.

The question is: will we choose to do it?

Scroll to Top
Verified by MonsterInsights